Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier
From: Alfredo Novoa (alfredo_at_ncs.es)
Date: 01/26/04
- Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- In reply to: Noons: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- Next in thread: Joe Weinstein: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- Reply: Joe Weinstein: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 26 Jan 2004 09:13:17 -0800
"Noons" <wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:<400e5175$0$4048$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...
> Minor correction: two-tier client-server is dead. Multi-tier is STILL client-server!
Indeed, it is all client-server. Tiers are physical, not logical.
There are only two logical tiers: the client and the server.
> Not that I agree: now that we finally have the gear (CPU and memory) and network
> bandwidth to make two-tier viable, what does this industry go and do? It kills it.
Two tier was always viable, but the current DBMSs are fatally flawed.
Regards
Alfredo
- Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- In reply to: Noons: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- Next in thread: Joe Weinstein: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- Reply: Joe Weinstein: "Re: choices regarding where to place code - in the database or middletier"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|