Re: Is perl better? :(((
akizub_at_yahoo.com
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Tom Dyess: "Re: Is perl better? :((("
- Previous message: akizub_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Is perl better? :((("
- In reply to: Chris Smith: "Re: Is perl better? :((("
- Next in thread: Juha Laiho: "Re: Is perl better? :((("
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Jan 2005 14:50:32 -0800
Sorry.
100% that all is the same.
100% that Java is not wasting the time.
And I'm sure in 100% that it is something with JDBC and Java
middleware.
See my code in this tread. I posted it twice altready.
And it's so pity when I open two windows for the same Solaris and see
that every 100'th SQL comes from perl in 5 seconds when Java produce
the same answer in the same exactly time and for the same exactly SQLs
(so there is no Oracle cache or hints or statistics, tune and so on are
different) 2-3 times slower.
And, trust me. There is no more pain for me that type the same perl
command in perl windows 3 times when it is still first run for Java and
for exactly the same result total.
Loosing hope.
Alex Kizub.
- Next message: Tom Dyess: "Re: Is perl better? :((("
- Previous message: akizub_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Is perl better? :((("
- In reply to: Chris Smith: "Re: Is perl better? :((("
- Next in thread: Juha Laiho: "Re: Is perl better? :((("
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
