Re: Apache Derby performance disappointing
- From: Dyreatnews@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:16:32 +0200
James Appleby <james.w.appleby@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hello,
I am currently adding Derby support to an application that already has
support for multiple DBMS via JDBC. I have found it to be
significantly slower than SQL Server or MySQL when performing the same
task. To provide this, I have created an exact duplicate database
within both Derby and SQL Server and ran the same query on both,
gathering timings.
You really should consider subscribing to derby-user and ask your
question there. To get help you probably need to include some more
details about your schema and the load you are running.
As Derby is marketing itself on the same level as MySQL (Apache
provide performance figures comparing it to this) then I anticipated
similiar performance, but instead it is taking twice as long as I
consider reasonable. Is this in line with anyone elses experience?
For a given type of load that is true. It may not be for your load.
--
dt
.
- References:
- Apache Derby performance disappointing
- From: James Appleby
- Apache Derby performance disappointing
- Prev by Date: Re: JavaDB / Apache Derby equivalent to the SQL Server IsNull, Oracle nvl and MySQL IfNull
- Next by Date: Re: JavaDB / Apache Derby equivalent to the SQL Server IsNull, Oracle nvl and MySQL IfNull
- Previous by thread: Re: Apache Derby performance disappointing
- Next by thread: Announce: A new open source O/R mapping tool
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|