Re: LDBC driver
- From: Thomas Kellerer <YQDHXVLMUBXG@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:32:56 +0200
Silvio Bierman, 04.06.2008 11:07:
I would never implement the workarounds you describe for SQLServer in any system if using a different database system is an option in any way. Since our software is a standard system we do not even offer large-scale performance on poorly-scaling database backends.
Completely agreed!
Although I have the impression that a SQL Server user wouldn't call the concept of using temp tables a workaround but rather a design principle ;)
But then I was lucky to not have to use SQL Server a lot, so I might be mistaken with that assumption.
Thomas
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDBC driver
- From: Silvio Bierman
- Re: LDBC driver
- References:
- LDBC driver
- From: blueparty
- Re: LDBC driver
- From: Lew
- Re: LDBC driver
- From: Thomas Kellerer
- Re: LDBC driver
- From: Silvio Bierman
- LDBC driver
- Prev by Date: Re: LDBC driver
- Next by Date: [red]Search for jobs in IT, marketing, software, finance.[/red]
- Previous by thread: Re: LDBC driver
- Next by thread: Re: LDBC driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|