Re: Do you still choose java????
From: Gerbrand van Dieijen (gerbrand_at_twistedPUNTwarande.net)
Date: 12/01/03
- Previous message: Philip Meyer: "Three question which is not yet answered clearly and correct so far !! challenging question in xsl and also in xsl fo"
- Next in thread: Peter Ashford: "Re: Do you still choose java????"
- Maybe reply: Peter Ashford: "Re: Do you still choose java????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:08:35 +0000 (UTC)
On 28 Nov 2003 09:22:38 -0800, Mike wrote:
>
>So I question the worthwhile-ness of using an exe version, other than
>making some windows clones 'happy' by showing them a 'trusty' exe.
>But hey, the client is always right, so I guess there might be the odd
>usage for something like Jet.
>(ie, used for religious applications).
If you're only concern is having a .exe file, you can use a 'wrapper' too,
and include the JRE lib in your installation dir (not very weird, more
applications do that).
I use exe4j for that, and it works very fine. You java application is
wrapped in a exe file that is completely transparant to the user. It even
shows up as your application in the process list of windows (rather then
process java).
-- Gerbrand van Dieijen
- Previous message: Philip Meyer: "Three question which is not yet answered clearly and correct so far !! challenging question in xsl and also in xsl fo"
- Next in thread: Peter Ashford: "Re: Do you still choose java????"
- Maybe reply: Peter Ashford: "Re: Do you still choose java????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|