Re: java performance w2k vs NT4

From: Andrew de Torres (detorres_at_ureach.com)
Date: 12/19/03


Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:58:26 -0800

My first thought is that similar specs may be different enough. Are the
graphics cards the same? Where is the difference in performance? Is it
start-up time? Is there a thread that causes periodic updates to the
tables and is that what appears to be taking more CPU? Personally, I
haven't compared applications on the same machine with WinNT vs. Win2k,
but I would look carefully at the hardware differences.

Andrew de Torres
* Sun Certified Java Programmer for J2SE
* Sun Certified Web Component Developer for J2EE
* Home: http://members.cox.net/detorres/

Bastien Raich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been developping a Java application using sun's 1.4.1 on my NT4
> box.
>
> It's a financial application that retrieves market data in real time,
> displays it in JTables, do some computations, and from which you can
> also open small dialogs to send orders to the market... client /
> server based (but not Java connection, it's a simple socket
> connection)
>
> my clients have been running NT4 for some time, and we recently
> decided to migrate to windows 2000. after all I had read about java
> portability and performances of w2k vs NT, I just quickly checked the
> app was starting up, and started the migration.
>
> however after we finished the first PC and ran it the next day in
> production, we realized everything was REALLY slow. I mean MUCH slower
> than on the other PCs still running NT4. I could not tell for sure (my
> users are remote), but CPU usage seems to be more intensive on the w2k
> box.
>
> another interesting thing was that things are REALLY slow with jre
> 1.4.2 and 1.4.1, but "quite ok, although slower" with jre 1.4.0 .
>
> I am really puzzled... the machines used are of pretty similar specs.
>
> so do you know of any perf. issue between those two OSes ?
> any specific code I should pay more attention to ?
> any known problem with w2k ? I searched the NG & knowledge bases with
> no success...
>
> thanks to share your knowledge !
>
> --Bastien



Relevant Pages

  • Re: InetAddress.equals() Anomoly?
    ... >> 1) The J# implementation is buggy because it does not follow the specs. ... > the very earliest of development of the Java language to be able to handle ... which converts DNS names to conical DNS names if the DNS server ... > InetAddress is exactly what its name implies: ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.vjsharp)
  • Re: InetAddress.equals() Anomoly?
    ... > 1) The J# implementation is buggy because it does not follow the specs. ... The Java spec for object equality was written in the very ... converts DNS names to conical DNS names if the DNS server returns that, ... InetAddress is exactly what ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.vjsharp)
  • Re: [opensuse] Eclipse 3.3
    ... On Thursday 15 November 2007 10:14:39 G T Smith wrote: ... earlier specs with 6. ... As I had stated elsewhere Eclipse recommend Sun ... Java v5 and give no guarantees on other versions at this time (though ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Please recommend me a concise, readable and complete summary of Java syntax
    ... I need some good Java documentation. ... > Hi, Robert and Peter! ... (compared with other specs I tried to digest in the past). ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)