Re: constructors and exception handling
From: Angus Parvis (angusparvis_at_hotmail.com)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:37:29 +0200
Angus Parvis wrote:
> When a method throws an exception, i always have to deal with it in some
> way (let it fall through or catch it).
> But when a constructor throws an exception, it does not have to be
> caught. Why that?
> I'm curious about the answer ;)