Re: UIDL: User Interface Description Language.
- From: "Dominic" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:38:08 GMT
Because JavaScript is an interpreted language and is therefore better suited
to the purpose of a browser (i.e. dynamically loaded pages). In addition,
the ability to browser the source of the pages (as per HTML) facilitates
information transfer.
Regards,
Dominic.
"Roedy Green" <see_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0ftin3hro981mqqr8v7do6vsep9sndkmq1@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:18:13 GMT, "Dominic" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote,
quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
Whilst this may sound similar to AJAX, the implementation is much cleaner
thanks to the ability to natively instantiate complex UI components within
the browser and the ability to transparently present server based objects
via their JavaScript proxies.
Why would not use Java on the client rather than JavaScript?
--
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
.
- References:
- Re: UIDL: User Interface Description Language.
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: UIDL: User Interface Description Language.
- Prev by Date: Re: Choppy refresh problem with JLabels and JMenuItem accelerators
- Next by Date: Re: Trying to put a background image in a JFrame
- Previous by thread: Re: UIDL: User Interface Description Language.
- Next by thread: Re: a complex swing task
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|