Re: Java as a first language
From: ge0rge (ge0rge_at_privacy.net)
Date: 10/18/03
- Next message: Chris Smith: "Re: Types of inheritance"
- Previous message: Chris Chilvers: "Re: import statement in jsdk 1.4.2"
- In reply to: Bob X: "Re: Java as a first language"
- Next in thread: Paul Lutus: "Re: Java as a first language"
- Reply: Paul Lutus: "Re: Java as a first language"
- Reply: Bob X: "Re: Java as a first language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 14:24:00 +0100
Bob X wrote:
...
>
> I have nothing to do with O'Reilly. I just like the book.
Now, this is really getting silly! I know there is a argument going on
in another thread - which would have been better followed up off line in
the first place. Helpers, like yourself, should not feel inhibited
because of an old git pontificating about moral standards and treating
everybody else as morons unable to understand what's written on a web page.
To the OP.
I also recommend Bruce Eckel free book on java
http://mindview.net/Books
ge0rge
-- For every problem there is one solution which is simple, neat, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken
- Next message: Chris Smith: "Re: Types of inheritance"
- Previous message: Chris Chilvers: "Re: import statement in jsdk 1.4.2"
- In reply to: Bob X: "Re: Java as a first language"
- Next in thread: Paul Lutus: "Re: Java as a first language"
- Reply: Paul Lutus: "Re: Java as a first language"
- Reply: Bob X: "Re: Java as a first language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|