Re: JVM For windows
From: Fountain of knowledge (google5_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/08/04
- Next message: lonelyplanet999: "Null reference ?"
- Previous message: Andrew Thompson: "Re: Mars Coordinates"
- In reply to: Andrew Thompson: "Re: JVM For windows"
- Next in thread: George Hester: "Re: JVM For windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Mar 2004 01:16:29 -0800
Andrew Thompson <SeeMySites@www.invalid> wrote in message news:<1kvc8c9kpniym.1j5g8c0cpovll.dlg@40tude.net>...
> On 6 Mar 2004 08:16:13 -0800, Fountain of knowledge wrote:
>
> > Well, thanks Sun Microsystems. Because of the court case against
> > Microsoft, I can no longer download and install the Microsoft Java
> > Virtual Machine for Windows 2000 SP4.
>
> If claims Sun made in the court case
> had been found to have no basis, it would
> have ended there.
>
> > Instead, I only have the option
> > to install yours. WHY? The Sun JVM is a bigger install,
>
> Most certainly is not.
> <http://www.physci.org/test/graph/index.jsp?nm=MS/VM+Size+(10Kb)&lbl=MS1.1.4+Sun1.1.8&val=575+139>
>
> Of course, Sun's VM did not have all those
> flaws and security holes built in, like MS'
> effort.
>
> P*ss off to some advocacy group where
> someone might care about your rantings..
> Troll.
complete nonsense. you obviously don't have much knowledge about
this. Sun is just as bad as Microsoft. They are ONLY complaining
because THEY are not on top with their machines on every desk.
- Next message: lonelyplanet999: "Null reference ?"
- Previous message: Andrew Thompson: "Re: Mars Coordinates"
- In reply to: Andrew Thompson: "Re: JVM For windows"
- Next in thread: George Hester: "Re: JVM For windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
