Re: shuffle loses/duplicates objects in LinkedList
From: Stefan Schulz (terra_at_spacetime.de)
Date: 01/19/05
- Previous message: PerfectDayToChaseTornados: "Re: mySQL"
- In reply to: Adrian Collister: "shuffle loses/duplicates objects in LinkedList"
- Next in thread: Adrian Collister: "Re: shuffle loses/duplicates objects in LinkedList"
- Reply: Adrian Collister: "Re: shuffle loses/duplicates objects in LinkedList"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:01:09 +0100
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:51:55 +0000, Adrian Collister wrote:
> // Simple Class which just contains an int.
> public class Int
> implements Comparable {
This should be a static class. javac rightly complains about that.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
12 1 15 3 10 14 2 5 13 18 6 8 11 17 19 4 0 7 16 9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Other then what i mentioned above, the program works as expected. As a
wild guess, maybe the gnu compiler provides a class called Int internally,
and this class has a very strange behaviour. Take a look at what
System.out.println(Int.class) prints on your box.
--
In pioneer days they used oxen for heavy pulling, and when one ox
couldn't budge a log, they didn't try to grow a larger ox. We shouldn't
be trying for bigger computers, but for more systems of computers.
--- Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper
- Previous message: PerfectDayToChaseTornados: "Re: mySQL"
- In reply to: Adrian Collister: "shuffle loses/duplicates objects in LinkedList"
- Next in thread: Adrian Collister: "Re: shuffle loses/duplicates objects in LinkedList"
- Reply: Adrian Collister: "Re: shuffle loses/duplicates objects in LinkedList"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]