Re: Very Confused on Page 33
From: Erwin Moller (since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much_at_spamyourself.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Previous message: Matt Humphrey: "Re: Very Confused on Page 33"
- In reply to: Erwin Moller: "Re: Very Confused on Page 33"
- Next in thread: Andrew Thompson: "Re: Very Confused on Page 33"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:36:05 +0100
Erwin Moller wrote:
A little correction:
> eBob.com wrote:
>
>> Without getting into what the meaning of is is, am I supposed to
>> understand that the derived class is the same type as the base class, but
>> the base class is not the same type as the derived class?
>
> Indeed.
>
> A cow is an animal.
> An animal is not (always) a cow.
Better would be:
Class Animal...
Class Cow extends Animal...
Now we have two types difined: Animal and Cow.
Both are of type Animal, but onle Cow is of type Cow.
Regards,
Erwin Moller
- Previous message: Matt Humphrey: "Re: Very Confused on Page 33"
- In reply to: Erwin Moller: "Re: Very Confused on Page 33"
- Next in thread: Andrew Thompson: "Re: Very Confused on Page 33"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]