Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: "Skip" <a@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:46:12 +0200
<snip>
> In either case, scolding someone or refusing to help because you feel
> its for their own good basically amounts to treating that person like a
> pet or a small child. It's insulting, and it's more likely to be
> upsetting than helpful.
It's more like when somebody asks a vague question. Instead of finding out
what they meant, with lots of possible erroneous assumptions, I ask "could
you rephrase that?". That isn't insulting, or threating a person like a
small child.
> Go ahead and suggest writing a simple example. Use Andrew's acronym if
> you desire. But please drop the condescending tone
I'm getting more irritated by your tone here. Can't we just exchange
opinions in a civil way? Thanks.
.
- References:
- Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Skip
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Chris Smith
- Why no SSCCEs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Collection -- disregard -- sorry..
- Next by Date: almost there!
- Previous by thread: Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- Next by thread: Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|