Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Andrew Thompson <seemysites@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:26:06 GMT
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
IIRC she didn't qualify for special assistance because "She didn't have a learning disability, just an extremely low IQ."
Doesn't 'an extremely low IQ' result in 'a learning disability'? Or is this simply a government(?) education/health department's way to cut costs by sticking to 'the letter of the definition'? .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- References:
- Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Why no SSCCEs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Book Recommendation
- Next by Date: Re: How often does a Java Web Start application update itself?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- Next by thread: Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- Index(es):