Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Andrew Thompson <seemysites@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:31:39 GMT
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
....
Apparently, in the eyes of whatever organization decides these things in the state or county or whatever has jurisdiction in which this girl lives, having an extremely low IQ is by definition not a learning disability.
Yes, it's awful. I don't really care *what* category someone is in, if they are genuinely trying to learn and can't do so, I think we as a society have some sort of responsibility to help them, even if they don't fit a particular label.
It is a pity that the citizens of the world fail to elect governments that are willing to pay more than lip service to the tenets of the U.D.o.H.R. To wit <http://www.physci.org/humanrt/humanrt.htm#26>. .
- References:
- Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Andrew Thompson
- Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Why no SSCCEs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- Next by Date: Re: How often does a Java Web Start application update itself?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- Next by thread: Re: Why no SSCCEs?
- Index(es):