Re: Artificial Intelligence
- From: Roedy Green <my_email_is_posted_on_my_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 23:49:50 GMT
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:29:35 GMT, "JS" <james.sarjeant90@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote or quoted :
>So are you saying that writing hard coded if statments isnt a good way to go
>about it unless we can decide which situations require which actions?because
>if we only have one statement that was written when we were told not to go
>into the street then we would never cross the road so we have to have two
>actions and decide which one is sensible to use in that situation
All I am saying is if statement style rules of thumb can be used
without any understanding WHY you should follow the rules. As a child
you don't need to have a traffic model to apply them. Later, once you
understand acceleration, mass, traffic, drunk drivers etc etc. you can
dispense with the rules of thumb and use your own internal modeling
which will sometimes tell you it is safe when the rules of thumb
predict danger and vice versa.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Again taking new Java programming contracts.
.
- References:
- Re: Artificial Intelligence
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Artificial Intelligence
- From: JS
- Re: Artificial Intelligence
- Prev by Date: Re: Artificial Intelligence
- Next by Date: Re: Time to ditch "SSCCE"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Artificial Intelligence
- Next by thread: Artificial Intelligence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
