Re: unusual inner class
- From: Roedy Green <my_email_is_posted_on_my_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:19:38 GMT
On 15 Oct 2005 10:41:18 +0200, Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
<jadedgamer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote or quoted :
>And it is: It's reserved for synthesized names - like that one. But
>once the names are there, they are available.
It is an ugly thing to use the synthesized names since they are
unstable. If you add some more inner classes, the existing ones will
get renumbered.
At least they had the wit to block you from creating a non-anonymous
class containing a $
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Again taking new Java programming contracts.
.
- References:
- unusual inner class
- From: Tim B
- Re: unusual inner class
- From: Thomas Hawtin
- Re: unusual inner class
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: unusual inner class
- From: Tim B
- Re: unusual inner class
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: unusual inner class
- From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
- unusual inner class
- Prev by Date: Re: about serial cable communication using Java
- Next by Date: Re: coding conventions
- Previous by thread: Re: unusual inner class
- Next by thread: Re: unusual inner class
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
