Re: Newbie - JAR question
- From: RedGrittyBrick <redgrittybrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:28:13 +0100
Andrew Thompson wrote:
RedGrittyBrick wrote:
..
And finally, you trashed Andrew when he was trying to help.
I don't believe I treated him any differently then he treated me.
I find that reacting to abhorrent behaviour by behaving abhorrently isn't usually useful. YMMV.
Huhh? I will have to trawl this thread more carefully, but
I did not realise anybody was being abhorrent!
a24900: "[Lee] trashed Andrew".
Lee: "I treated [Andrew] [as] he treated me"
Paraphrasing:
"I trashed Andrew because he trashed me"
RGB: "I find retaliating in kind isn't useful".
I didn't think you were being abhorrent. Even if you were, as a recipient, I hope I'd not be equally abhorrent when replying.
In future I shall be more careful how I phrase my trite homilies :-)
.
- References:
- Newbie - JAR question
- From: Lee A. Wentzel
- Re: Newbie - JAR question
- From: Lee A. Wentzel
- Re: Newbie - JAR question
- From: a24900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Newbie - JAR question
- From: Lee A. Wentzel
- Re: Newbie - JAR question
- From: RedGrittyBrick
- Newbie - JAR question
- Prev by Date: swing comments from an ex-C++ motif programmer
- Next by Date: When to log? (best practices and localization)
- Previous by thread: Re: Newbie - JAR question
- Next by thread: Re: Newbie - JAR question
- Index(es):