Re: [Kind-a OT] On a certain denizen
- From: "Daniel Dyer" <"You don't need it">
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:44:00 -0000
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:11:17 -0000, Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would normally place this on the c.l.j.p, but I am placing it here since I know that most people who read c.l.j.p also read c.l.j.h, and that by placing this message here, I will save a fair amount of Usenet traffic.
While I feel it is improper to initiate a discussion about someone behind his or her back, I feel more strongly that it would be easier on all to avoid the proper situation when the end outcome is already foreshadowed to be grim.
I wish you hadn't, I've got an awful feeling that all this nonsense is now going to spill over into here.
Personally, I don't think it is constructive to debate with him. He appears to view Usenet posting and debate differently from the rest of us. Since debating him is futile, just ignore him. I don't see the point in deliberately provoking him for sport.
Dan.
--
Daniel Dyer
https://watchmaker.dev.java.net - Evolutionary Computation for Java
.
- References:
- [Kind-a OT] On a certain denizen
- From: Joshua Cranmer
- [Kind-a OT] On a certain denizen
- Prev by Date: [Kind-a OT] On a certain denizen
- Next by Date: Re: Importing javax.faces.context.FacesContext for Glassfish
- Previous by thread: [Kind-a OT] On a certain denizen
- Next by thread: Re: On a certain denizen
- Index(es):