Re: New technology, old idea.... why not?
- From: TheBigPJ <TheBigPJ@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:25:33 -0800 (PST)
On 28 Feb, 13:12, Florian Huebner <florian.hueb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
TheBigPJ wrote:
Is this not the quickest way of sorting numerical data? aka takes n
(or O(n))?
The problem: Retrieving the data is very slow
Logically that makes sense yes.
But is that actually an attribute (if you like) of sorting data? aka
sorting is really 'Sorting and Retrieving'?
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New technology, old idea.... why not?
- From: TheBigPJ
- Re: New technology, old idea.... why not?
- References:
- New technology, old idea.... why not?
- From: TheBigPJ
- Re: New technology, old idea.... why not?
- From: Florian Huebner
- New technology, old idea.... why not?
- Prev by Date: Re: New technology, old idea.... why not?
- Next by Date: Re: New technology, old idea.... why not?
- Previous by thread: Re: New technology, old idea.... why not?
- Next by thread: Re: New technology, old idea.... why not?
- Index(es):