Re: -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- From: "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kt-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 May 2008 06:58:29 GMT
On Sun, 25 May 2008 05:47:25 +0000, danielstoner wrote:
Does anyone have any idea why the JVM terminates because of not enough
memory when there is more than enough contiguous memory? This is really
frustrating.
Does the memory really need to be contiguous under Windows? Why? With
paging of memory I didn't even know that such a thing really existed
anymore.
Page table anyone?
--
Kenneth P. Turvey <kt-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.electricsenator.net
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL AND NEWS
/ \
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- From: Don Leckie
- Re: -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- References:
- -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- From: Don Leckie
- Re: -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- From: danielstoner
- -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- Prev by Date: Re: -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- Next by Date: Re: -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- Previous by thread: Re: -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- Next by thread: Re: -Xmx---m getting smaller and smaller
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|