Re: OT: Spam
From: Dave Glasser (dglasser_at_pobox.com)
Date: 11/01/03
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Tomcat Startup Problem"
- Maybe in reply to: Thomas G. Marshall: "Re: OT: Spam"
- Next in thread: Thomas G. Marshall: "Re: OT: Spam"
- Reply: Thomas G. Marshall: "Re: OT: Spam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 14:08:58 -0500
Roedy Green <roedy@seewebsite.com> wrote on Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:23:29
GMT in comp.lang.java.programmer:
>
>I think the solution is to charge 50 cents to send an email, the money
>going to the receiver's account. For most people, it would balance
>out. If you were clever, you could get spammers to pay your rent for
>you by spamming to an account you never read. Fitting revenge.
This idea has been bandied about before, and it probably wouldn't take
a 50 cent charge to dry up a lot of spam. Even a penny would probably
do the trick. The reason spam is economically viable is because the
marginal cost of sending a single spam is essentially zero. If you
send out a million spams and sell only one stupid mini RC car or one
bottle of bogus penis enlargement pills, you're still ahead. At a
penny per, however, a million non-bounced spam emails would cost
$10,000.
Ideally, users could set up whitelists of known senders who could send
them stuff for free. (That would be needed for mailing lists.)
-- Check out QueryForm, a free, open source, Java/Swing-based front end for relational databases. http://qform.sourceforge.net
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Tomcat Startup Problem"
- Maybe in reply to: Thomas G. Marshall: "Re: OT: Spam"
- Next in thread: Thomas G. Marshall: "Re: OT: Spam"
- Reply: Thomas G. Marshall: "Re: OT: Spam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|