Re: lack of C's static local variables
From: Collin VanDyck (thehoppocket_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/03/04
- Next message: moon: "Re: variable might not have been initialized"
- Previous message: Thomas Fritsch: "Re: lack of C's static local variables"
- In reply to: Thomas Fritsch: "Re: lack of C's static local variables"
- Next in thread: Jon A. Cruz: "Re: lack of C's static local variables"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 18:55:18 GMT
> >
> > I nominate this reply for Most Worthless Posting of the Year.
> >
> > Next time, try using your time in a more constructive manner
> > (like wiping your ass more thoroughly) rather than confusing the
> > original poster with your inane rhetorical questions.
> >
> This applies to you as well.
> Next time, try using *your* time in a more constructive manner.
>
This reminds me of this horrible recursive method I wrote one time.
- Next message: moon: "Re: variable might not have been initialized"
- Previous message: Thomas Fritsch: "Re: lack of C's static local variables"
- In reply to: Thomas Fritsch: "Re: lack of C's static local variables"
- Next in thread: Jon A. Cruz: "Re: lack of C's static local variables"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|