Re: OS independent application possibility
From: Chris Smith (cdsmith_at_twu.net)
Date: 03/17/04
- Next message: Yang Song: "Process.waitFor() vs. Process.destroy()"
- Previous message: Alex Hunsley: "Re: Rules for constructors"
- In reply to: Efim Furman: "OS independent application possibility"
- Next in thread: John Parker: "Re: OS independent application possibility"
- Reply: John Parker: "Re: OS independent application possibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:36:16 -0700
Efim Furman wrote:
> I am new to JAVA development. (mostly C++, VC++ experience) I am
> investigating a possibility to write a JAVA application: Thin client,
> connecting to server, composing XML requests, getting XML responses,
> with simple local database and UI.
>
> The idea is to write an operating system independent code which would
> run on Windows, Macs, Linux, and mobile devices.
With the exception of "and mobile devices", it happens every day. For
most mobile devices, though, you're going to have to do this separately.
You can certainly use J2ME and MIDP to develop for a lot of mobile
devices at once; but that code will need to be somewhat different from
your code for desktop operating systems.
> Doing some research
> it seems to be this task is next to impossible. I researched the IDE
> for Blackberry handhelds, they seem to have fairly specialized UI and
> multithreading handling. The IDE also builds special CAD files to be
> put on the device.
Installation will also be a trick for mobile devices. Generally, if the
device can run J2ME code, then there will be some way to get J2ME code
onto it... but it may involve jumping through hoops.
-- www.designacourse.com The Easiest Way to Train Anyone... Anywhere. Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer/Technical Trainer MindIQ Corporation
- Next message: Yang Song: "Process.waitFor() vs. Process.destroy()"
- Previous message: Alex Hunsley: "Re: Rules for constructors"
- In reply to: Efim Furman: "OS independent application possibility"
- Next in thread: John Parker: "Re: OS independent application possibility"
- Reply: John Parker: "Re: OS independent application possibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]