Re: impl a collection
From: Roedy Green (look-on_at_mindprod.com.invalid)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Roedy Green: "Re: Parsing HTML Source in Subdirectory/Auto-gen/CGI pages"
- Previous message: Sam Palanivel: "Java return a value to Unix variable"
- In reply to: NOBODY: "Re: impl a collection"
- Next in thread: NOBODY: "Re: impl a collection"
- Reply: NOBODY: "Re: impl a collection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:23:52 GMT
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:38:29 GMT, NOBODY <antispam@0.0.0.0> wrote or
quoted :
>When you will be forced to buy a special motherboard that is not limited
>to 1.5 gig ram, you will understand.
I hear you and I don't understand why you should blanket "not use
arrays" as the OP commanded. What alterative is there? Arrays are the
most efficient ways to store data in Java.
The overhead he was worried about is one of the most insignificant
factors in RAM usage.
-- Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green. Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming. See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
- Next message: Roedy Green: "Re: Parsing HTML Source in Subdirectory/Auto-gen/CGI pages"
- Previous message: Sam Palanivel: "Java return a value to Unix variable"
- In reply to: NOBODY: "Re: impl a collection"
- Next in thread: NOBODY: "Re: impl a collection"
- Reply: NOBODY: "Re: impl a collection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|