Re: Difference between .NET and Java
From: Tony Morris (not_at_telling.you)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Tony Morris: "Re: Difference between .NET and Java"
- Previous message: peter: "Re: EncryptoPro!"
- In reply to: Jeremy Deats': "Re: Difference between .NET and Java"
- Next in thread: Chris Smith: "Re: Difference between .NET and Java"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:18:49 GMT
> I'd argue the usefulness of code refactoring, but that is subjective..
> IBM's current IDE product fall a bit short on delivering VS.NET style
> "intellisense" functionality and code generation, but the context
sensitive
> help is another huge beneift that comes to mind. Not to mention the ease
of
> managing solutions, maybe it's just my lack of experience with other IDEs,
> perhaps they should be more intuitive.
a) I disagree - which of "IBM's current IDE products" are you referring to?
b) This statement assumes that the "IBM's current IDE" is the most
feature-rich available IDE available. One could easily argue that Intellij
IDEA is in fact far more feature-rich than VS .NET. I'll leave further
comment to other posters - I could never agree that VS .NET is more
feature-rich than today's tools for Java - I don't think anyone reasonably
could.
-- Tony Morris http://xdweb.net/~dibblego/
- Next message: Tony Morris: "Re: Difference between .NET and Java"
- Previous message: peter: "Re: EncryptoPro!"
- In reply to: Jeremy Deats': "Re: Difference between .NET and Java"
- Next in thread: Chris Smith: "Re: Difference between .NET and Java"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]