Re: WANTED: SOFTWARE INVENTIONS

From: IchBin (weconsul_at_ptd.net)
Date: 08/30/04 

Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:58:06 -0400

Paul Lutus wrote:
> Marcello do Guzman wrote:
>
>
>>PAUL,
>>
>>You harbor a lot of anger don't you.
>
>
> No, I just think frauds should be unmasked as soon as possible.
>
>
>>You don't know a damn thing about
>>me.
>
>
> I know plenty about you, and if you don't want me to post all of it here,
> stop polluting this newsgroup.
>
>
>>I saw your website and there is absolutely nothing on your webiste
>>of any value to society.
>
>
> I see you can invent new lies to go along with the old ones. Not surprising.
> Here is the truth:
>
> Sites linked to http://arachnoid.com: 1,080
>
> Sites linked to http://maxpages.com/myvideos: 0
>
> Source: Google. Linkage is a metric used by Google and other search engines
> to evaluate the value of a website. It is similar in principle to the
> number of scientific papers that refer to one of your own.
>
> Therefore, according to Google, there is abosolutely nothing of value to
> anyone on your site.
>
>
>>First I am not a shark.
>
>
> Yes, you are. You have no qualifications, no idea how you appear to others,
> and no prospects.
>
>
>>Anyone who really
>>believes they have a software product that would be of interest to
>>investors, by all means respond.
>
>
> Yes, if you don't care about your future.
>
>
>>Disregard Paul's post. He is nothing,
>>but a loser,
>
>
> Yes. A multimillionaire loser with an international reputation.
>
>
>>who for whatever eason, has decided to become the chief
>>of police for thisw NG.
>
>
> No police needed, only people whose consciences are intact:
>
> "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
> nothing." -- Edmund Burke.
>
>
>>I don;t report to you Paul,
>
>
> You don't report to a conscience either.
>
>
>>so please take
>>your *** someplace else.
>
>
> And this is how you expect to get people to trust you to represent them
> before venture capitalists? You just destroyed what was left of your
> credibility. It was a small step downward.
>
>
>>Any bright programmers with real software
>>products, in the areas that I mentioned in my post, please contact me.
>
>
> No bright programmers are stupid enough to trust this ex-videotape salesman
> with no experience and no conscience.
>
>
>>If you software fills a need in the market or solves a problem not
>>currently addressed, I definitely what to know about.
>
>
> I repeat for those who missed it: "I definitely what to know about." To
> represent programmers, you must at least know standard English grammar.
> This is only part of a long list of requirements.
>
> Finally, anyone who posts advertisements in Usenet newsgroups hasn't a clue.
> It violates the rules and charter of most newsgroups, including this one.
> It abuses the medium, and it alienates the very people on whom you would
> like to depend for your sorry livelihood: programmers.
>
> You couldn't kidnap a clue at gunpoint.
>
Thank you Paul, for your insight, to put this scum bag in his true place
in life!