.Net vs Java

From: Moonraker (roger_at_moore.bond.007)
Date: 12/31/04 

Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:57:12 GMT

After working extensively with .Net and Java, these are the differences I
see:

Java does not have Reflection.Emit
But it does have Reflection.

That's okay so far, because most programmers are too dumb to use
Reflection.Emit.

Visual Studio .net is the easiest way to create web services.

Windows.Forms, while easy to create, are hopelessly behind other toolkits
such as Swing and Gtk.

Relevant Pages

  • .Net vs Java
    ... After working extensively with .Net and Java, ... But it does have Reflection. ... That's okay so far, because most programmers are too dumb to use ... such as Swing and Gtk. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: jar files and CLASSPATH
    ... These are classes from a third-party provider. ... > it seems to find classes in xerces.jar okay but not in other jar files. ... should also use the -classpath option to declare it, otherwise java ...
    (comp.lang.java.developer)
  • java 1.5 InetAddr doesnt consult system hosts file unless run from [pseudo]tty?
    ... When run without a tty, ... IBM-supplied java 1.5; recreated below with current Sun java 1.5 for ... Run it via ssh to self... ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Uninitialized variables
    ... >> different, plainer words? ... > Is there a Fortran equivalent of Java? ... Okay, that is clear - though it raises many other questions:). ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Internet explorer has lost its dynamic visuals - straight html
    ... As for your original post about having plain-looking web sites come up, in addition to the Java - ... Then on the Advanced tab, scroll down to the Multimedia section and make sure everything you want is checked there, click Apply, Okay. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)