Re: .Net vs Java
From: 7 (website_has_email_at_www.ecu.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 12/31/04
- Next message: Moonraker: "Re: .Net vs Java"
- Previous message: Rogier R. Spaans: "Re: umm a very newbie question in querys"
- In reply to: Moonraker: ".Net vs Java"
- Next in thread: Moonraker: "Re: .Net vs Java"
- Reply: Moonraker: "Re: .Net vs Java"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:17:35 GMT
Moonraker wrote:
>
> After working extensively with .Net and Java, these are the differences I
> see:
>
> Java does not have Reflection.Emit
> But it does have Reflection.
>
> That's okay so far, because most programmers are too dumb to use
> Reflection.Emit.
>
> Visual Studio .net is the easiest way to create web services.
>
> Windows.Forms, while easy to create, are hopelessly behind other toolkits
> such as Swing and Gtk.
Have you tried Mono as replacement for .net?
Some of the 200 odd liveCDs that boot from CD
and run without having to install come with mono already working.
http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php
All free and done up techies with open source source code
to configure and modify to heart's content.
- Next message: Moonraker: "Re: .Net vs Java"
- Previous message: Rogier R. Spaans: "Re: umm a very newbie question in querys"
- In reply to: Moonraker: ".Net vs Java"
- Next in thread: Moonraker: "Re: .Net vs Java"
- Reply: Moonraker: "Re: .Net vs Java"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|