Re: Static classes

From: "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 17:24:17 +0100

Altman wrote:
> I am making a class called utilities which I plan to have a couple of
> static methods in it. I have declared the class as follows.
> public class Utilities {
> public static Settings userData = new Settings();
> // static methods go here
> }
>
> My question is: do I have to create an instance of the Utilities
> class in order for my userData object to be available?

No.

(But I wouldn't expose a non-final field like that, myself.)

-- chris

.

References:
- Static classes
  - From: Altman

Prev by Date: Re: Problem with streamed ZIP file and Windows XP
Next by Date: Re: Standard Dicom images in java
Previous by thread: Static classes
Next by thread: Re: Static classes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Static classes
... > static methods in it. ... > public class Utilities { ... > public static Settings userData = new Settings; ...
(comp.lang.java.programmer)
Re: Static classes
... static methods in it. ... public static Settings userData = new Settings; ...
(comp.lang.java.programmer)
Static classes
... I am making a class called utilities which I plan to have a couple of ... static methods in it. ... public static Settings userData = new Settings; ...
(comp.lang.java.programmer)
Re: global functions?
... refer to the physical location such as another DLL or the app_code folder. ... just make another class and create static methods. ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)