Re: Substitute for database table ?
- From: iandavidward@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 11 May 2005 05:13:37 -0700
Matt,
I'm not sure I follow your descriptions or if they correspond to what
I've got but I suspect that your assessment won't change if I just ask
you to confirm on this recap......
I'd have a table of several thousand rows and, say, four columns - I've
a value which I want to find but I don't know which column it'll be in
- I need to know the other values of the row (and which columns they're
in) so I'm looking for the row, obviously.
To improve the performance I'd put indexes on all the columns. I don't
think I'm interested in any sort of key. I'm not sure what you mean by
'the n-ary position'.
There is another scenario where I know what column the value should be
in which is more straightforward.
I just thought that maybe having something in memory would make it
quicker and lighter and that a DBMS would be a sledgehammer for a
relatively small nut. Your comment about the volume of data relates to
how much memory I'd need I suppose.
Ian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Substitute for database table ?
- From: Matt Humphrey
- Re: Substitute for database table ?
- References:
- Substitute for database table ?
- From: iandavidward
- Re: Substitute for database table ?
- From: Matt Humphrey
- Substitute for database table ?
- Prev by Date: Re: java xml parsing, euro signs disapear
- Next by Date: Re: call.invoke
- Previous by thread: Re: Substitute for database table ?
- Next by thread: Re: Substitute for database table ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|