Re: peer to peer messaging

"Guy Noir" <ahackney@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1117119994.504588.45180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Start with 2 machines on the same subnet. Get your services working and
> then work your way out to dealing with NAT issues.

Coo! That's clever! Then when you find that your system architecture cannot
be extended to work across NAT boxes you just go to your boss and/or client
and tell them that you've wasted your time and their money so far, now you
need to start again from scratch to design a system that's actually going to
be useful!

Not a career-enhancing approach, I would suggest.

--
Tim Ward
Brett Ward Limited - www.brettward.co.uk


.

Relevant Pages

  • Cisco 2811 max. troughput
    ... Is anyone here had some experience with Cisco 2811 routers (256 MB RAM) ... dealing with around 15 Mbps bidirectional and simultaneous? ... I'm interesting if I have NAT, CBAC, IPS and QoS (including ... class-based traffic shaping) with around 2600 active NAT translations ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: peer to peer messaging
    ... >> then work your way out to dealing with NAT issues. ... (Yes I do know that it's possible to design protocols so that they ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: peer to peer messaging
    ... then work your way out to dealing with NAT issues. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)