Re: Java v/s ImageMagick
- From: "Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 20:52:47 GMT
"Andrew Thompson" <SeeMySites@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:s7a84aota31z$.1wewug8axrtnr.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 6 Sep 2005 03:12:24 -0700, Yogee wrote:
>> Can some body point 2 good library
>
> Well I was recently working with ..wait, that was
> only *one* library, I better not mention it.
>
> [ Hint: ask for any information, rather than specify
> conditions on the information. ]
I think the OP meant "Can somebody point me *TO* a good library?" rather
than "Can somebody point me to *TWO* good libraries".
Also, if we're going to be pendantic, you should probably phrase it as
"Ask for information that is both helpful to you and which requires the
minimal amount of effort for other people to provide, so as to maximize the
chance that the effort required is below those people's laziness-threshhold
and thus the chance that they actually help you." Otherwise, to ask for
*any* information might yield results such as "The earth is round", "I like
cheese", "42", etc.
That being said, I agree with Andrew's request for more specifics. What
kind of file size limitations are we looking at here?
- Oliver
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java v/s ImageMagick
- From: Andrew Thompson
- Re: Java v/s ImageMagick
- References:
- Java v/s ImageMagick
- From: Yogee
- Re: Java v/s ImageMagick
- From: Andrew Thompson
- Java v/s ImageMagick
- Prev by Date: Re: Quite a dilemma
- Next by Date: Re: Does using generics complicate the use of interface-type declarations?
- Previous by thread: Re: Java v/s ImageMagick
- Next by thread: Re: Java v/s ImageMagick
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
