Re: Efficient hashmap serialization?
- From: "Sn0tters@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Sn0tters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Sep 2005 07:13:38 -0700
Once RMI gets it's mits on the Hashtable I presume it keeps the lock
exclusively so for the transmission I don't think that would be a
problem.
I've seen in my implmentation that concurrency does not seem to be an
issue ( so far! )
Wil
.
- References:
- Efficient hashmap serialization?
- From: Sn0tters@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Efficient hashmap serialization?
- From: jan V
- Re: Efficient hashmap serialization?
- From: Sn0tters@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Efficient hashmap serialization?
- From: Raymond DeCampo
- Efficient hashmap serialization?
- Prev by Date: Re: Efficient hashmap serialization?
- Next by Date: Re: left-padding ints
- Previous by thread: Re: Efficient hashmap serialization?
- Next by thread: Re: Efficient hashmap serialization?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|