Re: static and threads
- From: Roedy Green <look-on@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:02:27 GMT
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:40:47 +0100, "Chris Uppal"
<chris.uppal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote or quoted :
> In that language classes are full objects
In Java this is feels somewhat squishy. Classes are sort of like
objects. You have the static fields which are a bit like instance
variables of a class object. You also have the twin .class object that
owns methods like getresource. You don't have any direct way to
instantiate a class or modify its methods.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Again taking new Java programming contracts.
.
- References:
- static and threads
- From: Wizumwalt@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: static and threads
- From: John C. Bollinger
- Re: static and threads
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: static and threads
- From: John C. Bollinger
- Re: static and threads
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: static and threads
- From: John C. Bollinger
- Re: static and threads
- From: John C. Bollinger
- Re: static and threads
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: static and threads
- From: John C. Bollinger
- Re: static and threads
- From: Chris Uppal
- static and threads
- Prev by Date: Re: library for rendering HTML
- Next by Date: Re: static and threads
- Previous by thread: Re: static and threads
- Next by thread: Re: static and threads
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|