Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- From: "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:02:13 -0000
Mickey Segal wrote:
> I submitted the report to Sun and got the usual message of:
>
> "Please be aware that the large volume of reports we receive sometimes
> prevents us from responding individually to each message. We currently
> have a three week response time for responding to Bug Reports."
>
> As I recall, they do better in reality than this low standard of
> responsiveness.
;-)
It's called "managing expectations".
(A good idea for bug-submission system: generate such messages dynamically
based on the current backlog doubled and rounded up to a prime number of
weeks...)
-- chris
.
- References:
- Re: How stable is 1.5?
- From: Mickey Segal
- Re: How stable is 1.5?
- From: Larry Barowski
- Re: How stable is 1.5?
- From: Mickey Segal
- Re: How stable is 1.5?
- From: Larry Barowski
- Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- From: Mickey Segal
- Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- From: Mickey Segal
- Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- From: Mickey Segal
- Re: How stable is 1.5?
- Prev by Date: Re: boolean endsWith(String s, Pattern pattern)
- Next by Date: Re: Bug tracking tools for Java app
- Previous by thread: Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- Next by thread: Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|