Re: Question about synchronized

Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
> John C. Bollinger wrote:
> > Yes. You should think of synchronization as protecting sections of code
> > -- either blocks or methods -- not objects.
>
> Yes! And where were you when I was getting railed on for making such a
> claim in september '04?

I also wondered if "John" is being spoofed, or possibly has been taken over by
mind-eating aliens ;-)

For the record: /I/ am still me, and so am unchanged in my opinion that talking
of "protecting sections of code" is badly misleading...

-- chris



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: No NAIS Rally in WA
    ... John D wrote: ... protecting small and large producers and the ... consumer. ...
    (sci.agriculture.poultry)
  • Re: Military Rates
    ... John, first let me say that if you are active military, Thank You for ... protecting our country!! ... Our Marine has stayed at Barbery Coast and ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: OT Virus Protection
    ... multiple seat license type anti virus.... ... >> how many pc's need protecting? ...
    (rec.motorcycles.dirt)
  • Re: Raymarine self compatibility
    ... What's your interest, John? ... Are you a Raymarine dealer? ... protecting an obvious crap product? ...
    (rec.boats.electronics)
  • Re: Absolute path in Manifest Class-Path header?
    ... >> John C. Bollinger wrote: ... >>>I STRONGLY suspect that this is an implementation quirk, ... Lee Fesperman, FFE Software, Inc. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)