Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Benji <bdg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:37:22 +0000 (UTC)
Roedy Green, while chewing on bamboo shoots, wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:07:47 GMT, "Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>>Would you consider a Java program in
>>which the keyword "native" never appears to be a 100% pure Java program?
> There is on such thing as a Java program that uses no native methods.
> The core methods of Java are necessarily native methods. That is not
> what 100% pure java means.
OK, now you're just being a jerk. Either stop replying to him, or
explain what you mean.
--
Of making better designs there is no end,
and much refactoring wearies the body.
.
- References:
- Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Pep
- Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Pep
- Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- From: Roedy Green
- Differences between C++ and Java
- Prev by Date: Re: BigDecimal and trigonometrics
- Next by Date: Re: BigDecimal and trigonometrics
- Previous by thread: Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- Next by thread: Re: Differences between C++ and Java
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|