Re: Anonymous and local class names changed in 1.5

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:15:06 GMT, "Mike Schilling"
<mscottschilling@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :

>I don't see any bug. The change to local class names in 1.4.2 *was* a
>bugfix, IIRC, because the previous names could be ambiguous, but the 1.4.2.
>naming convention worked perfectly well.

To me they seem wrong if that description of the names is correct. A
name should reflect something's proper place in the hierarchy. (how
feudal!) In any case the designers were putting the naming rules in
the JLS so they probably decided to tidy them up to make them easier
to explain and easier to defend.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.
.

Relevant Pages