Re: Best Java ever
- From: "Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamlicious_z_XXX_m@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:10:34 -0700
"Monique Y. Mudama" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrndnuqqp.npn.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 2005-11-19, Roedy Green penned:
>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:54:49 -0700, "Monique Y. Mudama"
>><spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone
>>who said :
>>
>>>My work machine only has 512MB, though. I wish it had more, but for
>>>some reason that's the standard here.
>>
>> Same here. I have Win2K. Presumably you have WinXP which would
>> leave less room for Java.
>
> I do have winXP. I don't know if it takes more memory, though.
It does.
Email me, and I will send you a tweak guide for saving memory.
Or go buy another stick of 512 Mb ram.
--
LTP
:)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best Java ever
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Re: Best Java ever
- References:
- Best Java ever
- From: JS
- Re: Best Java ever
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Best Java ever
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Re: Best Java ever
- From: Jim Korman
- Re: Best Java ever
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Re: Best Java ever
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Best Java ever
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Best Java ever
- Prev by Date: Re: how to generate warning from compiler?
- Next by Date: A Pixel Matching Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Best Java ever
- Next by thread: Re: Best Java ever
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|