Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED



Despite my optimism that this bug reported on 8 November
(www.segal.org/java/sun_jit/) would get processed quickly there has been no
word from Sun after more than three weeks. One would hope that reproducible
crash bugs would get treated with a greater sense of urgency.

"Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:...
> I submitted the report to Sun and got the usual message of:
>
> "Please be aware that the large volume of reports we receive sometimes
> prevents us from responding individually to each message. We currently
> have a three week response time for responding to Bug Reports."
>
> As I recall, they do better in reality than this low standard of
> responsiveness.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
    ... > I submitted the report to Sun and got the usual message of: ... > have a three week response time for responding to Bug Reports." ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux
    ... > reports without a support contract (unless of course, they're responding to a ... I've never had a Sun support contract, ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux
    ... > reports without a support contract (unless of course, they're responding to a ... I've never had a Sun support contract, ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: 108528-19 and up crashes sun4m (Sparc 10)
    ... >>Responding to both of the answers I got, I will l let you know that ... >Include the partition table. ... where can I obtain a prom patch or flash prom update for ... >to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: GPS altitude to GIS elevation at same position
    ... > The IP address is correct, and the server is responding to PING from ... I haven't had any other reports of "can't reach your Web ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)