Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- From: "Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:58:52 -0500
Despite my optimism that this bug reported on 8 November
(www.segal.org/java/sun_jit/) would get processed quickly there has been no
word from Sun after more than three weeks. One would hope that reproducible
crash bugs would get treated with a greater sense of urgency.
"Mickey Segal" <not_monitored@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:...
> I submitted the report to Sun and got the usual message of:
>
> "Please be aware that the large volume of reports we receive sometimes
> prevents us from responding individually to each message. We currently
> have a three week response time for responding to Bug Reports."
>
> As I recall, they do better in reality than this low standard of
> responsiveness.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- From: Mickey Segal
- Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- Prev by Date: Deploying WAR file on Sun One WS
- Next by Date: Re: object entry queue
- Previous by thread: Deploying WAR file on Sun One WS
- Next by thread: Re: How stable is 1.5? CRASH REPRODUCED
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|