Re: generic oversight?
- From: Thomas Hawtin <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:54:15 +0000
ricky.clarkson@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
For this (and other) reasons I implemented my own collection wrappers, which wrap Collection, List, etc., but have more sane API, including contains(T). This isn't currently public, because I'm lazy, but it could be.
The collections are fundamentally part of the Java language. If I see code using collections, then I expect it to be all standard stuff. No need to look anything up. There is a high price to pay for going non-standard.
Tom Hawtin -- Unemployed English Java programmer http://jroller.com/page/tackline/ .
- References:
- generic oversight?
- From: VisionSet
- Re: generic oversight?
- From: Thomas Hawtin
- Re: generic oversight?
- From: ricky.clarkson@xxxxxxxxx
- generic oversight?
- Prev by Date: Re: Teaching Children (was Re: Help, where to start learning Java)
- Next by Date: Re: J2ME + MIDP 2.0 + SecureConnection (SSL)
- Previous by thread: Re: generic oversight?
- Next by thread: firework applet with function for lightening the scenery?
- Index(es):