Re: Understanding NAT, Firewalls, TCP/IP
- From: Roedy Green <my_email_is_posted_on_my_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:29:02 GMT
On 10 Jan 2006 22:22:17 -0800, "Mark H" <mehaase@xxxxxxxxx> wrote,
quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>Roedy I don't understand what the question is. Is it simply what port
>to use? Don't use port 80 unless you're connecting to http servers.
>Even if you write your own app on port 80, that doesn't mean that
>Windows firewall won't block your application. A hardware firewall
>obviously won't know the difference, but most hardware firewalls built
>into NAT routers don't block outgoing requests anyway.
My problem is, I can do this app very easily with permanent sockets
exchanging serialised object messages. I then don't need to set up
Tomcat or the like, just my own very simple server that won't require
any expertise to install.
But if I got that route, I thought I might get in trouble with
firewalls. My clients won't have a clue what to do. So what I have
to do is use Tomcat and Servlets and traditional HTTP messages, though
JAWS apps send them instead of browsers.
Which brings up another question.. Does http have a way of SENDING
unarmoured binary to the server, or only the other way?
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Understanding NAT, Firewalls, TCP/IP
- From: Thomas Weidenfeller
- Re: Understanding NAT, Firewalls, TCP/IP
- References:
- Understanding NAT, Firewalls, TCP/IP
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Understanding NAT, Firewalls, TCP/IP
- From: Mark H
- Understanding NAT, Firewalls, TCP/IP
- Prev by Date: package problem
- Next by Date: Re: package problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Understanding NAT, Firewalls, TCP/IP
- Next by thread: Re: Understanding NAT, Firewalls, TCP/IP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|