Re: synchronized class
- From: "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:13:06 GMT
"Thomas Hawtin" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43dfa14e$0$1491$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> John Goche wrote:
>>
>> I would like to know whether the "synchronized class" construct is
>> valid in JDK 1.5 and whether it has any meaning at all in the context
>> of multithreaded programming or whether the compiler will ignore it
>> altogether. I have read some posts stating that "synchronized class"
>> is not a legal way to begin a Java class definitions. Any comments
>> on this would be sincerely appreciated.
>
> JDK 1.0.2 (not sure about 1.1, certainly not 1.2) allowed "synchronized
> class". That was a bug. IIRC, it set the equivalent but unassigned bit in
> class file. It had, and has still, absolutely no effect on runtime
> behaviour.
It has a huge effect on runtime behavior now: if you can't compile a class,
it won't run.
.
- References:
- synchronized class
- From: John Goche
- Re: synchronized class
- From: Thomas Hawtin
- synchronized class
- Prev by Date: Is HTTP Stateful or Stateless?
- Next by Date: Re: Various Interest Rates
- Previous by thread: Re: synchronized class
- Next by thread: URL file chooser
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
