Re: They ALL suck! [Was: On Java and C++]
- From: Andrew McDonagh <news@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:07:17 +0100
James McGill wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 11:13 +0100, Alex Buell wrote:
NB: It's a JOKE!
Production work I did in VB2.0 when it was new, is still in production.
I think that code might be nearly old enough to vote.
and your point is?
longevity of use is no indicator of a 'good' language - its simply that the application does what it was supposed to OR the company is unwilling to rewrite for some reason if it isn't doing as its supposed to.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: They ALL suck! [Was: On Java and C++]
- From: Alex Buell
- Re: They ALL suck! [Was: On Java and C++]
- References:
- Re: They ALL suck! [Was: On Java and C++]
- From: James McGill
- Re: They ALL suck! [Was: On Java and C++]
- Prev by Date: Re: Socket connection between Java and C possible?
- Next by Date: Re: Give me some advice about some books of Java programing!
- Previous by thread: Re: They ALL suck! [Was: On Java and C++]
- Next by thread: Re: They ALL suck! [Was: On Java and C++]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|