Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- From: Chris Smith <cdsmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:00:43 -0600
Stefan Ram <ram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Such points of time also have the drawback that they are not
Lorentz invariant, i.e., they can not be extended to the whole
spacetime unless a specific frame of reference is chosen.
I don't know that "drawback" is the word I would have chosen. Perhaps
"property that is irrelevant in practice". :)
--
www.designacourse.com
The Easiest Way To Train Anyone... Anywhere.
Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer/Technical Trainer
MindIQ Corporation
.
- References:
- 4 .Net contract positions
- From: luckystarduke
- Re: 4 .Net contract positions
- From: Rhino
- Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java? (was: 4 .Net contract positions)
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- From: Timo Stamm
- Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- From: Oliver Wong
- 4 .Net contract positions
- Prev by Date: Re: Axis: Way to look into a call.invoke() xml code?
- Next by Date: Re: Function for removing Accents?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- Next by thread: Re: Is JavaScript "completely unrelated" to Java?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|