Re: Question on abstract classes versus interfaces
- From: alexandre_paterson@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 24 May 2006 09:01:38 -0700
Hi Chris,
Chris Uppal wrote:
....
Let's take an aside into "multiple-inheritance". Some people like to say that....
Java has multiple inheritance of interfaces. That's technically true, but I
think it misses the point entirely -- and is highly misleading.
So why is that like multiple inheritance ? Answer: it
isn't like multiple inheritance at all !
That was a long post!
:)
After reading it, I've got two questions for you:
- if "MI of interfaces" isn't like MI at all, like you're saying,
do you conside single inheritance of interface inheritance at all?
- do you think it is mandatory to rely on concrete inheritance
to achieve OOP ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on abstract classes versus interfaces
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: Question on abstract classes versus interfaces
- References:
- Question on abstract classes versus interfaces
- From: mdinino
- Re: Question on abstract classes versus interfaces
- From: Chris Uppal
- Question on abstract classes versus interfaces
- Prev by Date: how many XML files ?
- Next by Date: Re: cross domain single sign-on with JAAS
- Previous by thread: Re: Question on abstract classes versus interfaces
- Next by thread: Re: Question on abstract classes versus interfaces
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|