Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- From: "Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamlicious_z_XXX_m@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:25:59 -0600
"Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:447c159c$1$778$bed64819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'd consider declaring this kinds of classes abstract is a kind of safety
belt.
IMO, the "abstract" doesn't add any safety, it just reduces functionality.
(I
do understand your point, I just don't really agree with it.)
Hmm - for a novice programmer who doesn't know what he/she is doing,
something like a carefully placed assert or abstract class to prevent them
from doing something wrong can be very helpful. I have never encountered a
problem like this in Java, but in MSVC++.
--
LTP
:)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- References:
- Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- From: chris brat
- Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- From: Juha Laiho
- Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- Prev by Date: Re: subclassing and generics
- Next by Date: PL/SQL Debugger Question
- Previous by thread: Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- Next by thread: Re: A simple question for Abstract Class
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|