Re: JMS vs .... ?
- From: "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:01:29 +0100
David N. Welton wrote:
I was looking at JMS as a potential alternative, but some of the guys in
the local JUG didn't seem very enthusiastic about it as a solution,
suggesting it might be better to just 'roll my own' - a row in the
database that gets updated to say "I've been read" when the file has
been fetched via http. Admittedly, that's an improvement over the
current system, and seems simpler than fiddling with JMS...
If the simple solution will in fact solve your problem (e.g no issues with
atomicity, or of reliable access to the database), then the only reason I can
think of for invoking the complexities of JMS would be that you want to put JMS
on your CV[*].
-- chris
[*] == "resume" for people in the US
.
- References:
- JMS vs .... ?
- From: David N. Welton
- JMS vs .... ?
- Prev by Date: Thank you all !! -> Re: Handling multiple exceptions in one exception handler block
- Next by Date: Re: Aside from googling....
- Previous by thread: JMS vs .... ?
- Next by thread: Handling multiple exceptions in one exception handler block
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|