Re: jview vs java.exe (speed)
- From: "Andrew Thompson" <andrewthommo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2006 08:37:51 -0700
Thomas Magma wrote:
....
I just got a new OS (XP) that didn't include a JVM or jview. I was using
jview to run my local Java applications but now have to switch to java.exe.
What a difference!! and not for the better.
JView - launching the MS JVM, provides
access to am obsolete, unsupported VM
with security holes that will *never* be fixed.
The manufacturers own 'support' advice for the
MSVM amounted to*
1) a tool to identify dependencies on MS
specific classes, and
2) a link to Sun, for the Java Plug-In.
* last time I checked, over 18 months ago.
The MSVM does not support Swing (out of the box)
or anything else since ..Java 1.2.
...I have a little application that
does DSP and animation and it appears to be running between 5 and 10 as slow
now.
Apparently this tool you refer to uses no MS
specific classes, so that leaves you with option 2).
..Am I doing something wrong? If not, how do I reinstall jview?
1) Get a time machine..
...
Andrew T.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: jview vs java.exe (speed)
- From: Thomas Magma
- Re: jview vs java.exe (speed)
- References:
- jview vs java.exe (speed)
- From: Thomas Magma
- jview vs java.exe (speed)
- Prev by Date: Form submission Encoding Problem - saving Japanese text to the database
- Next by Date: Re: Best way to get user input from the console window?
- Previous by thread: jview vs java.exe (speed)
- Next by thread: Re: jview vs java.exe (speed)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
